Digital Health Expert Inga Bergen
Body & Soul

Inga Bergen: How Generation Z Is Changing Healthcare

Inga Bergen is THE expert when it comes to digital health in Germany. As an entrepreneur, investor, podcaster, and sought-after speaker, she is shaping the discussion on the future of healthcare. In this interview, she discusses why our healthcare system still lags behind technological possibilities, how Generation Z is changing the way we approach health, and which innovations are actually making a difference. Inga Bergen will be speaking at Health Day 2026.Interview: Simone Bohny/Christin Müller

​​​​​​​"I look forward to a medical field that recognizes that women aren't just little men." (Inga Bergen)

What motivates you to be so passionate about the future of healthcare?

Inga Bergen: I’ve founded and led two companies in the digital health sector—and in doing so, I’ve learned just how slowly a system moves that should actually be the most innovative one we have. What drives me is the gap between what has long been medically and technologically possible and what people actually experience when they’re sick. This gap isn’t a technological problem. It’s a problem of structure, incentives, and courage. And that’s exactly why I’m staying the course: because it can be solved.

In your opinion, what makes Generation Z different from other generations when it comes to health?

I’m cautious about generational narratives—they often explain less than they claim to. But what I really observe is this: This generation no longer makes a clear distinction between health and everyday life. Mental health, sleep, nutrition, exercise, work—these form a continuum, not a set of separate areas of responsibility. This clashes with a system that is organized precisely along lines of responsibility: boundaries between medical specialties, between sectors, and between payers. The conflict isn’t “young versus old.” It’s “integrated experience versus fragmented care.”

Gen Z is the first generation to have grown up entirely with digital technologies. What expectations will they therefore have of doctors, hospitals, and health insurance companies in the future?

Three that I consider to be structural:

First: Expectation sovereignty. People who are used to every service being transparent, bookable, and easy to track won’t accept that an appointment takes six weeks and no one can explain why.

Second: Access to data as a given. Not as a right that must be fought for, but as a fundamental condition.

Third—and this is often underestimated—is the quality of the relationship. Digital literacy does not mean a desire for distance. On the contrary: the more interchangeable the transaction, the greater the value of genuine medical care. Anyone who thinks an app can replace that connection has misunderstood the issue.

What digital developments will truly change the way we approach health in the coming years?

Not so much the spectacular ones, but rather the mundane ones. Interoperable data. AI in documentation and decision support—not because it replaces doctors, but because it frees up their time. And above all: moving diagnostics forward—from the hospital to everyday life, from acute care to early detection.

What interests me more than the technology is the question of who benefits from it. We’re currently in danger of building a system that works exceptionally well for digitally empowered, well-insured people who are health-conscious—and makes things worse than before for everyone else. This isn’t a technical issue, but a matter of distribution.

Many young people today are much more critical of medical advice than previous generations. Is this a sign of greater health literacy or a dangerous overconfidence?

To be honest: neither. I think the question doesn't quite capture the issue.

What we are seeing is not an increase in competence or arrogance, but a loss of trust in institutions coupled with a radical shift in information sources. That is something different.

Health literacy—as measured by standard tools—tends to be rather low across all age groups in Germany, including among young people. What has changed is not people’s ability, but their access: Today, every recommendation is immediately accompanied by a thousand other voices, and none of them bears a seal that can be recognized at a glance.

The answer to this isn’t to reclaim authority. You either have it or you don’t. The answer is to provide a rationale. Saying “That’s just how we do it” doesn’t work anymore. Saying “That’s how we do it because—and here’s the evidence, and here are its limitations” does work very well. It’s more work. But it’s also better.

You speak with many thought leaders in the healthcare sector and have been following innovations for years. Looking ahead to the next ten years, which developments are you most excited about?

The moment when “prevention” is no longer just a buzzword everyone tosses around in political speeches but that no one actually funds. We’re currently witnessing a rare convergence of factors: the technology is here, cost pressures are inevitable, and a new generation is emerging for whom prevention isn’t a sacrifice but a form of self-empowerment. When these three elements come together, something fundamental shifts.

And, to be more specific: I’m looking forward to a medical field that recognizes that women aren’t just little men. Things are finally moving in that direction—too slowly, but they’re moving.

To wrap things up, here’s a quick generational quiz: If you could “steal” one trait from Generation Z, which one would it be? And conversely, is there anything Generation Z could perhaps learn from older generations?

If I could, I’d steal the ease with which this generation talks about mental health. My generation dealt with it on our own and called it strength. It wasn’t.

Conversely: Be patient with systems. Not compliance—patience. Some important things don’t change in eighteen months, but in eighteen years, and anyone who’s only looking for quick results will walk out before things get interesting.

No one approaches the truly major shifts in the healthcare sector as a sprint.

pme Health — Holistic Workplace Health Management

We offer in-person and digital consulting in organizational development, GBU Psyche, and BEM design and support—supplemented digitally by our Mindance app, which features over 1,000 interactive video and audio sessions, bookable one-on-one coaching sessions, and a 24/7 ExpertLine. 

Discover Now: Health Management for Businesses

zero How ILB makes employees crisis-proof

The ILB building in Potsdam
Leadership & HR

Strengthening team resilience: How ILB makes employees crisis-proof

In this interview, Kathleen Wiesener, HR Development Officer at the Investitionsbank des Landes Brandenburg (ILB), sheds light on the importance of a strong team spirit and how targeted measures such as coaching, feedback culture and external moderation help to strengthen employees. She explains which strategies ILB uses to create a resilient working environment in which employees receive the support they need to be successful in crisis situations.

What does ILB mean by team resilience and why is it particularly important for the company?

For us, team resilience means the ability of a team to overcome challenges, crises or stressful situations together and emerge stronger. This includes cohesion, mutual support, good communication and trust within the group. A resilient team can adapt quickly to new circumstances and remains productive even in difficult times.

What specific challenges do you face in strengthening the resilience of your teams?

Digitalization presents our employees with considerable adjustment requirements. In addition, there are frequent reorganizations, for example due to new guidelines or efficiency measures. There is also a high workload in many areas due to sickness absences or unfilled expert positions as a result of the shortage of specialists.

How have you anchored the topic of team resilience in your organization?

ILB recognized team cohesion and resilience as key issues many years ago. We offer our employees systematic support from coaches and trainers from the pme Academy. We have succeeded in raising awareness among managers that good team dynamics promote well-being. This leads to fewer conflicts and less sickness-related absences and strengthens the team's performance.

How does the cooperation with the pme Academy work?

The pme Academy supports us in the organization of team meetings and the moderation of larger workshops - ranging from small teams of 4 people to entire areas with 80 participants. We also work together with their conflict moderators. Managers are part of the system and therefore cannot mediate neutrally, which is why external support is very valuable. There are also preventative offers that enable managers and employees to address conflicts and provide feedback.

Unleash the full potential of your managers and teams now.

Our trainers and coaches at the pme Academy support you in difficult transformation and change processes or analyze together how you can make even better use of your team's strengths. 

More information on the seminars and training courses: pme Academy

What effect do these offers have on your employees?

Our employees find these offers very helpful. They appreciate being able to talk about team spirit away from the daily work routine. Since the coronavirus pandemic, many have been working from home, which has led to fewer informal meetings and more social distancing. Hybrid or digital meetings are often very business-oriented, but personal interaction is crucial to strengthen bonds and a sense of community.

How do managers specifically support their teams in difficult times and ensure a resilient working environment?

We promote a sense of unity in a variety of ways in order to strengthen cooperation. Together with the workforce, we have developed guidelines for transparent, constructive communication, a lively feedback culture and cross-divisional collaboration.
Not only managers but also employees are responsible for regularly discussing and reflecting on these values. Regular team events offer the opportunity to maintain personal connections despite hybrid working models and to discuss common interests beyond work content.

What measures do you take to ensure that employees dare to speak openly about challenges or mistakes?

Dealing constructively with mistakes and challenges is firmly anchored in our vision of a learning organization. We promote transparency and encourage our managers to support their employees and adopt a solution-oriented approach instead of looking for someone to blame.

How does this work in practice? Are there tools and techniques for systematically talking about setbacks and mistakes?

We systematically integrate the topic of feedback into our annual appraisals and thus repeatedly raise awareness of its importance. There have also been campaigns on how to give constructive feedback, with newsletters, postcard campaigns and training measures.

What programs, training or resources do you offer to continuously promote the resilience of teams and individuals?

In addition to various communication training courses, such as conflict management, we offer teams the opportunity to call in external mediators or moderators for team building in times of crisis. The pme Familienservice is an important partner here.
In addition, all managers have the opportunity to choose a coach to support them in challenging situations. In day-to-day work, it's often all about the "what" and less about the "how". When a team is reassembled or a new manager is appointed, we support the process with targeted guidance.

How do you ensure that employees are not overwhelmed in stressful phases and remain productive?

Stress management is a key issue that we support through training for both our employees and managers. It is an essential part of management development so that they can protect themselves and their teams from overload and manage crises in a targeted manner. We also offer social counseling and practical support in difficult private and professional situations via an external partner.

We are currently experiencing a very strong polarization in society. Is this also noticeable in your teams? Are the conflicts growing?

My perception is that we are very reluctant to talk about politics, possibly to avoid conflict. I can only speak for my team here: It is very important to us to treat each other with respect, and that includes respecting different opinions. One example was the vaccination debate during the coronavirus pandemic, where there were both supporters and opponents. I experienced a lot of tolerance. Good cooperation is important to us and helps us to overcome crises together.