Digital Health Expert Inga Bergen
Body & Soul

Inga Bergen: How Generation Z Is Changing Healthcare

Inga Bergen is THE expert when it comes to digital health in Germany. As an entrepreneur, investor, podcaster, and sought-after speaker, she is shaping the discussion on the future of healthcare. In this interview, she discusses why our healthcare system still lags behind technological possibilities, how Generation Z is changing the way we approach health, and which innovations are actually making a difference. Inga Bergen will be speaking at Health Day 2026.Interview: Simone Bohny/Christin Müller

​​​​​​​"I look forward to a medical field that recognizes that women aren't just little men." (Inga Bergen)

What motivates you to be so passionate about the future of healthcare?

Inga Bergen: I’ve founded and led two companies in the digital health sector—and in doing so, I’ve learned just how slowly a system moves that should actually be the most innovative one we have. What drives me is the gap between what has long been medically and technologically possible and what people actually experience when they’re sick. This gap isn’t a technological problem. It’s a problem of structure, incentives, and courage. And that’s exactly why I’m staying the course: because it can be solved.

In your opinion, what makes Generation Z different from other generations when it comes to health?

I’m cautious about generational narratives—they often explain less than they claim to. But what I really observe is this: This generation no longer makes a clear distinction between health and everyday life. Mental health, sleep, nutrition, exercise, work—these form a continuum, not a set of separate areas of responsibility. This clashes with a system that is organized precisely along lines of responsibility: boundaries between medical specialties, between sectors, and between payers. The conflict isn’t “young versus old.” It’s “integrated experience versus fragmented care.”

Gen Z is the first generation to have grown up entirely with digital technologies. What expectations will they therefore have of doctors, hospitals, and health insurance companies in the future?

Three that I consider to be structural:

First: Expectation sovereignty. People who are used to every service being transparent, bookable, and easy to track won’t accept that an appointment takes six weeks and no one can explain why.

Second: Access to data as a given. Not as a right that must be fought for, but as a fundamental condition.

Third—and this is often underestimated—is the quality of the relationship. Digital literacy does not mean a desire for distance. On the contrary: the more interchangeable the transaction, the greater the value of genuine medical care. Anyone who thinks an app can replace that connection has misunderstood the issue.

What digital developments will truly change the way we approach health in the coming years?

Not so much the spectacular ones, but rather the mundane ones. Interoperable data. AI in documentation and decision support—not because it replaces doctors, but because it frees up their time. And above all: moving diagnostics forward—from the hospital to everyday life, from acute care to early detection.

What interests me more than the technology is the question of who benefits from it. We’re currently in danger of building a system that works exceptionally well for digitally empowered, well-insured people who are health-conscious—and makes things worse than before for everyone else. This isn’t a technical issue, but a matter of distribution.

Many young people today are much more critical of medical advice than previous generations. Is this a sign of greater health literacy or a dangerous overconfidence?

To be honest: neither. I think the question doesn't quite capture the issue.

What we are seeing is not an increase in competence or arrogance, but a loss of trust in institutions coupled with a radical shift in information sources. That is something different.

Health literacy—as measured by standard tools—tends to be rather low across all age groups in Germany, including among young people. What has changed is not people’s ability, but their access: Today, every recommendation is immediately accompanied by a thousand other voices, and none of them bears a seal that can be recognized at a glance.

The answer to this isn’t to reclaim authority. You either have it or you don’t. The answer is to provide a rationale. Saying “That’s just how we do it” doesn’t work anymore. Saying “That’s how we do it because—and here’s the evidence, and here are its limitations” does work very well. It’s more work. But it’s also better.

You speak with many thought leaders in the healthcare sector and have been following innovations for years. Looking ahead to the next ten years, which developments are you most excited about?

The moment when “prevention” is no longer just a buzzword everyone tosses around in political speeches but that no one actually funds. We’re currently witnessing a rare convergence of factors: the technology is here, cost pressures are inevitable, and a new generation is emerging for whom prevention isn’t a sacrifice but a form of self-empowerment. When these three elements come together, something fundamental shifts.

And, to be more specific: I’m looking forward to a medical field that recognizes that women aren’t just little men. Things are finally moving in that direction—too slowly, but they’re moving.

To wrap things up, here’s a quick generational quiz: If you could “steal” one trait from Generation Z, which one would it be? And conversely, is there anything Generation Z could perhaps learn from older generations?

If I could, I’d steal the ease with which this generation talks about mental health. My generation dealt with it on our own and called it strength. It wasn’t.

Conversely: Be patient with systems. Not compliance—patience. Some important things don’t change in eighteen months, but in eighteen years, and anyone who’s only looking for quick results will walk out before things get interesting.

No one approaches the truly major shifts in the healthcare sector as a sprint.

pme Health — Holistic Workplace Health Management

We offer in-person and digital consulting in organizational development, GBU Psyche, and BEM design and support—supplemented digitally by our Mindance app, which features over 1,000 interactive video and audio sessions, bookable one-on-one coaching sessions, and a 24/7 ExpertLine. 

Discover Now: Health Management for Businesses

zero Helicopter parents: the effects of overprotective parenting

A girl hangs upside down from a tree
Parent & Child

What defines helicopter parents?

The anxious mother who takes her child everywhere by car and picks him up again, the controlling father who keeps a close eye on school performance and never shies away from a teacher's talk ...  

While many parents want to support their children in order to smooth their path, they often end up becoming "helicopter parents." However, this overprotective attitude, which usually stems from their own worries and fears, can have a significant impact on the development of their children's independence. 

An article by Ramona Krämer, parent counselor and systemic family therapist at pme Familienservice.

What are "helicopter parents"?  

"Helicopter parents" are parents who are constantly close to their children and circle around them like a helicopter so that they can intervene at any time if they think their child needs support or protection. 

The parenting style of helicopter parents is characterized by

  • Over-involvement
  • Restriction of the child's autonomy 
  • Overprotection 
  • Assigning blame to third parties, e.g. when educators are held responsible if their own child has conflicts in the childcare center .

What is the difference between helicopter parents and lawnmower parents? 

In contrast to helicopter parents, lawnmower parents try to clear any potential challenge or difficulty out of the way at an early stage - preferably in advance. They "mow down" all obstacles before the child encounters them. 

Both parenting styles are characterized by a strong overprotectiveness, but with a different approach: helicopter parents are more reactive, while lawnmower parents plan and act more in advance.

What is behind it when parents are overprotective?  

The overprotectiveness of helicopter parents often stems from their own fears.

There are usually reasons for the parents' overprotective behavior that lie in their past and are linked to experiences - before, during or after pregnancy: for example, a long fertility treatment, complications during pregnancy or birth, premature births, as well as postpartum depression or their own upbringing that they grew up with. 

At the same time, the world is becoming more and more complex, and through media coverage we learn of many disasters around us and in the world, giving us the feeling that the world is more dangerous and unsafe for our children. 

The desire for control often stems from the need to do something about one's own powerlessness and helplessness.
 

We overestimate the probability of events! 

In psychology, this is known as the availability heuristic: an abbreviated, cognitive conclusion in which the probability of events is assessed according to their topicality and vividness in memory. 

This means that tragic news becomes engrained, leading to a heightened sense of risk and thus to misjudgments and errors in judgment. This often results in increased protective measures 

What impact do helicopter parents have on their children?  

The overprotective parenting style leads to children becominganxious and developing phobias or fears themselves.

Before children can gather their own experiences, they rely on the experiences of their caregivers. This type of transfer of experience is very long-lasting, unlike other forms of learning that quickly fade if they are not repeated.

Phobias and fears, such as fear of spiders or the dentist or fear of loss, are transferred from the primary caregiver to their children. This happens on a non-verbal level, through facial expressions, gestures and smell. 

What helps? Name and disclose your own fear!
 

Do the reality check!

Exchange ideas with other parents or your partner: 

- Are there real dangers or is it a perceived insecurity? 

- What can children of this age be expected to do? 

- How do you handle this? 

- Do you have similar fears?

 

BUT the parental role model is not the only factor that determines whether a child develops anxiety. Genetic, biological and socio-cultural influences also play a role here. 

Example 1: An anxious mother limits her adventurous son's freedom of movement, which leads to frequent conflicts. Although the mother's anxiety is often noticeable, it is probably not transferred directly to the son. 

Example 2: A rather cautious child is severely restricted in its independence by its parents. It is less and less confident in mastering challenges on its own and does not learn to develop the ability to act. 

How do children of helicopter parents behave? 

The overprotectiveness of helicopter parents has a strong influence on their children's development . This can be seen in their motor skills, risk assessment and frustration tolerance.

The influence on children's motor development and risk assessment

In its "More safety through movement" series of publications, Unfallkasse Hessen states that children who are allowed to move freely have fewer accidents . Children need free movement and the space to experience things for themselves.

They need challenges, borderline experiences and experiences of failure in order to learn to assess risks correctly and develop self-confidence.

The influence on children's resilience and frustration tolerance 

Overprotected children who experience hardly any negative emotions, consequences and frustration while growing up develop less self-efficacy and suffer more frequently from anxiety disorders, according to studies by Stanford University (2021) and Florida Atlantic University (2023).  

This makes it all the more important that children learn to deal with frustration, injustice, conflicts and even accidents at an early age and in an age-appropriate manner

How can we make our children strong? 

Parents - and helicopter parents in particular - must learn to endure their own fears and worries.  

Instead of restricting your own child with well-intentioned overprotection, children need to be supported in their independence. In this way, they can develop crisis skills and learn to assert themselves independently.  

This is also confirmed by the Florida Atlantic University study (2023), which shows that children and young people who spend a lot of time playing freely and riskily and are used to solving problems without parental guidance are mentally happier .

It is therefore important that parents promote their child's self-efficacy and resilience and give them the freedom they need.

5 tips on how to find a healthy level of care

1. see care as support for the independent development of your child. The long-term goal of parents should be to make themselves dispensable. After all, we want our children to be able to manage their own lives when they move out. 

2 Only help your child if he or she asks for it.  

3. ask your child questions instead of giving direct answers and thus anticipating a solution. 

4. do not relieve your child of challenges, but support them in finding a solution themselves. 

5. only provide support until the point is reached where your child can take over on their own. 

"The role of parents is to support their child only until the child can take over on their own—not to do everything for the child or remove all challenges from their path." - Ramona Krämer, parent counselor at pme Familienservice

The pme parent counseling service

Our parent counselors support parents in all matters from pregnancy to the child's adulthood.  

Personal and confidential: We are there for you online, by phone and on site. You can find more information on the pme parent counseling page.